发一些国外的DIY效果器网站
www.freestompboxes.orgwww.diystompboxes.com
http://www.tonepad.com/
http://www.ssguitar.com/
www.diyplayer.com台湾的
www.madbeanpedals.com
http://www.geofex.com/
http://www.muzique.com/
http://www.ampage.org/
好好看这些网站，学学人家那种态度。
当然你看多了，你就知道最近火爆的山寨klon那块pcb怎么来的，也不用假装挖什么黑胶，说什么国外的都是sb，连山寨都不会，参数什么的都量错了。。
[ 本帖最后由 Lamborrari 于 2012-2-20 00:04 编辑 ] Finnegan/Klon wrote:
Some info on the new overdrive unit.
Hi guys -
First off, here are some things about the new production unit - things that don't pertain to its appearance - that I imagine you would like to know (I will go into its appearance in a separate post):
Aside from the new switchable buffer/true-bypass feature, the circuit of the new unit is identical to that of the discontinued Centaur with one exception necessitated by the new feature: a 2-megohm resistor was added to prevent switching pop from the discharge part of an existing capacitor's charge/discharge cycle, and the value of the existing resistor that sets the input impedance of the circuit was increased from 1 megohm to 2 megohms. These two resistors, the new one and the existing one, are in parallel, resulting in an input impedance of 1 megohm, the same as that of the Centaur: the incoming signal "sees" exactly the same impedance it saw in the Centaur, and the resulting sound is exactly the same. The switchable buffer/true-bypass design, by the way, was the work of my friend Paul Cochrane of Tim/Timmy fame, who is one of the smartest and coolest people I know, so big thanks and tip-of-the-hat to Paul.
The new unit will have the exact same NOS germanium diodes that I used throughout the fifteen years of Centaur production. I'm aware that a number of people over the years have made snide remarks about what they've tended to refer to as the "magic" diodes, and stated that they can't hear a difference between these and whatever diodes the various would-be cloners use, so here's what I've said on the subject many times and will now say yet again: I have never considered this particular diode (a specific part from a specific manufacturer, back when they were still making it) to be "magic" in any way - I simply consider it, after a ton of listening to every possible substitute, to be the best-sounding diode in my circuit, a circuit that I and my two design partners (successively) worked on for four-and-a-half years and that I understand from the inside-out, in a way that I have a hard time imagining any of the would-be cloners could. This diode may well sound not-so-good in any number of other overdrive or distortion circuits (it's not "magic", remember?), but my long-held and always self-challenged opinion is that thus far it is clearly the best-sounding one, and by a not-inconsiderable margin, in my circuit. For those people who claim not to be able to hear a difference between what it has to offer and what other diodes have to offer in my circuit, my question is a simple one: REALLY?
The diode-saga is crumbling.
Finnegan/Klon wrote:
The above begs an obvious question: does the new unit sound the same as the Centaur did? After a great deal of listening over the course of a long period of time, including lots of blind A/B testing, my opinion is that it does.
On an unrelated note, the circuit board of the new unit will not be covered in the epoxy potting compound I used to cover the boards of the Centaur units.
The first success in fighting gooop
Finnegan/Klon wrote:
Lastly, the new unit will not be called the Centaur II or anything even remotely like that; as a production unit the Centaur is dead and gone and has been for more than two years now, so why live in the past? I'm not doing it because I've found it not to be healthy, so take from that what you will. As for the new unit's name, it has an informal one, but not a formal one: nothing has ever suggested itself strongly enough to make a real case for itself as a just-plain-right-and-inevitable name. I refer to it as the KTR, which hints at the informal name; please don't ask me what that is, and please don't drive yourselves crazy trying to guess what it is - I'm sure you'll grant that I can't be held responsible, etc.
Regards,
Bill Finnegan
Klon
[ 本帖最后由 Lamborrari 于 2012-2-20 00:11 编辑 ] 好，学习了，虽然我这个英文水平看起来好吃力，但是还是坚持看完了。。。。
楼主的二沙发，走你~！ 不错的网站 頂你,再多一些国外的DIY效果器网站
http://www.sabrotone.com/?attachment_id=1769
http://tagboardeffects.blogspot.com/
http://revolutiondeux.blogspot.com/2008/01/klown-centaur.html 好吧，SB说的国外的都是SB。
网图全是对的，大家尽可放心仿制，最近火爆的那块山寨KLON完全是垃圾，做这种垃圾的人一定是脑残。
楼主是不是心里痛快多了？ 呵呵，既然你都卖完了，我也不想跟你们争了。。。不过你们下次山寨，还要以这种手段销售，说什么只有你的图是对的，别人挖了胶也都是扒错的图，我再来喷。我跟你也没利益冲突，就是看不下去你这样的手段。。pcb都照抄了，还非要说网图不准。。。 没有人说你和我们有利益冲突啊，所以有没有卖完于您也没什么所谓对吧。
对于我自己来说，网图仅仅是个参考。我知道我自己该信什么，那就是我们手头这块银马，还有我的示波器和Multisim。
对于你们吗，恐怕我说网图对或不对，你们也都不会信吧，何必认真。
至于PCB照抄，这个就不知道从哪说的了，布板哥表示内牛满面。希望楼主有一天能真正看到我们KLON里面的PCB板。 楼主贴的站都不错哟。。 吵吵吵吵大门口就听你们吵吵了 都小点声 隔壁上夜班一会来砸门了 这个的顶 原帖由 leibass 于 2012-2-20 09:40 发表
没有人说你和我们有利益冲突啊，所以有没有卖完于您也没什么所谓对吧。
对于我自己来说，网图仅仅是个参考。我知道我自己该信什么，那就是我们手头这块银马，还有我的示波器和Multisim。
对于你们吗，恐怕我说 ...
你们那个贴里的贴出来的成品pcb的图，真的和网上的一模一样。那个图网上很早就有了。。。
[ 本帖最后由 Airneyking 于 2012-2-25 12:35 编辑 ] 这是你们的，您说一不一样啊？ 做个标记 原帖由 Airneyking 于 2012-2-25 12:30 发表
你们那个贴里的贴出来的成品pcb的图，真的和网上的一模一样。那个图网上很早就有了。。。
哥们这个图是哪个站的。求连接，我也去观摩下。 原帖由 寂静的黑夜 于 2012-3-5 11:16 发表
哥们这个图是哪个站的。求连接，我也去观摩下。
忘了从哪下的了。。。、 标记一下 好东西阿,找了好久一点一点学习 楼主好人。。不过好多网站是英文。对于我这个英文白来说好多好东西都不知道怎么看 该怎么浏览呢。我一般都要翻墙看 顶顶顶 mark!!!好贴！
页:
[1]