吉他侠客
UID20229
好友
回帖0
主题
精华
积分4759
阅读权限255
注册时间2003-1-9
最后登录1970-1-1
在线时间 小时
|
发表于 2003-4-4 12:16:00
|
显示全部楼层
AGUADO IS ON FASHION!
哪位有时间翻译一下,一位国外吉他爱好者的来信
An inquest performed by the magazine Mundo Guitarristico (Guitar World) in 1977, among more than a hundred performers of classic guitar, gathered accidentally in an improvement course, resulted in the detection of two clearly different tendencies with reference to the guitar interpretation: the timbring ones and the phrasing ones.
Much has been discussed over this classification, specially with reference to names. The inquest determined that the timbring ones, openly admirers of Andres Segovia, stated their difference -among a set of more than dozen characteristics- by the timbre goal, which required the intensive use of timbre in the guitar, as fundamental performing recourse. Other traits was the rejection of non-guitar transcriptions, the performer's subordination to the aesthetic goals, rejection of instrumental variations which impair the guitar essence, using guitar as a soloist instrument, rejection of avant-garde music as not being adequate for guitar, total systematization of the technical resources for timbre accomplishments, etc.
On the other end the phrasing ones insisted in the stylistic goal, for this purpose they insisted as the main performance requirement, the structural analysis of phrasing and completed the list of recommendations with the transcription adequacy to stylistic needs, they stressed the mission of the guitar interpreter within the society ensemble, accepted ancient instruments and other instrumental variations as adequate to stylistic goals, they sustained the guitar integration as chamber instrument, they accepted the vanguard as a style of the music history and pushed for the total systematization of instrumental resources to adequate them to stylistic aims.
A good exercise of auto-analysis that our faithful readers can perform is to determine within the tendency that they favor, having into account the above mentioned characteristics.
The principal objection opposed to this classification was of nomenclature. It was sustained that the word "phrasing" was imperfect and did not reflect clearly the position of these guitar players and alternate names were proposed such as stylists, scholars, academics, cultured, etc. The eminent denomination which in these bulletins we use , even with variations, has the origin in this classification.
But whichever the name applied to these two aesthetic positions, all along 30 years it is clear that timbring and the phrasism are two tendencies of the guitar interpretation in Argentina.
With the reservations of the preceding determined nomenclature and that we eventually share, we are using the imperfect but popular phrasist denomination to identify those guitar players which share the characteristics determined before.
Periodically the opposition arises. Either the timbring players praise until excess some guitar player that fulfils the requirement established or the phrasing players inclined reverently to those performers who supposedly respect with the historic severity the stylistic characteristcs of authors interpreted. In these cases, whatever contributes to the recreation of original situation, seems to drive to aesthetic delirium.
In this issue we would like to comment to our readers a direct consequence of this endless a direct consequence of this endless opposition between timbring and phrasist players, which have resulted in an unexpected fact - but most satisfactory of the guitar life in Buenos Aires: the re-discovering of the maximum universal guitar figure: Mr. Dionisio Aguado and his famous guitar Method.
Surprisingly Aguado is in full fashion.
AGUADO TIMBRIST?
To understand fully to what it has happened it is important to design panoramically the situation of the guitar player -extended to all instrumental players- in Argentina, which no matter the crisis situation of the country, could be applied to many developed countries.
1.. Decadence of the institution "public concert"
The public concert, where a soloist presents himself to the public who pays an entry to listen to him, it is in true decadence or if one tries to frame it, to reduce it to its minimum limits. This does not mean that music is not listened. Other technological methods, recording C.D., DVD, TV have surpassed the professional barrier and are presently a common patrimony. To go to a public concert is not essential to listen to music and only a minimum of society does so.
2.. New professional guidance for the soloist musician.
The soloist guitar player, whose principal activity is centered in his presentation "live" is replaced by a recorded musical reproduction and consequently addresses his work toward other related activities, as surviving method. One of the them is the integration with musical groups (ancient music, popular ways like tango, jazz, folk, contemporary cultivated music, etc.) addressed to some specialized activity which allows them to perform a practice and at the same time to deepen their knowledge in the field.
3.. Competition obliges to excelling and specialization.
The deepening of knowledge, the use of extra-musical resources and research in collateral fields or related to the musical activity are ways used regularly by musicians as a need of the new stage of music at the beginning of XXI century.
It is within this situation frame that different guitar groups proliferated in Buenos Aires, which deepened research towards musical interpretation and the timbre tendency increased its perspective towards Dionisio Aguado works and his Method for guitar.
One of the strongest arguments is its reaction against the T醨rega School, stressing the fact that the dazzlement it produced at the beginning of 1900, darkened the vision of the past, specially the classic school, for which it was completely uninterested. This position has among its important theoreticians Professor Emilio Colombo, co-author of an important methodology for the guitar study based on the Manuel Lopez Ramos school and that in the N?105 issue of Guitar World it was published an essay over "..in my work as guitar player and teacher, I never arrived to enough arguments that would me consider Master T醨rega's contribution as a school". Obviously, Prof. Colombo is a severe critic of the phrasing position.
The timbre ones have discovered in Aguado's method a support never dreamed over the use of timbre. Aguado states in his method "each chord offers variety in the sound quality, according to the way the right hand fingers play it and this variety is greater when touched with the nails. Playing the same chord with the thumb and after with any of the other fingers, an important difference in the quality of sounds is noticeable" (Aguado in italics).
This Aguado statement that makes the timbre ones crazy is ratified all along the method and justifies amply to incorporate Aguado to their favor.
Which was the cause that this aspect was not noticed before? Supposedly it is the T醨rega school to blame, specially the version of Aguado method of A. Sin髉oli (Ricordi Ed.) which faced the revision from T醨rega's propositions, leaving aside the timbre elements of the classic school.
To the war front, there are the luthiers with their modern guitars, which allow the timbre performance, and give the necessary sound volume for the achievement of enchanting pieces.
But the battle only begins.
AGUADO IS A PHRASING ONE!
Entirely affirmative, the phrasing ones support their position firmly. Looking into the folds of the historic investigation, the background supporting their interpretation, is related to the method's edition around 1825, with the incorporation to the guitar the new elements of German instrumental music which counterparted the opera way reigning during the XVIII century. And they find their foundation in the incorporation to the guitar interpretation, of the dynamic resources in clear counterposition to the supremacy of the harpsichord that could not perform them due to physical placement of the instrument and also as an effort towards putting the guitar at the same level of the growing influence of the "pianoforte" which started to enjoy public preferences.
|
|